Why Self-Awareness Is Overrated (Without a System to Act on It)
95% of leaders think they're self-aware. Only 10-15% are. But even real self-awareness is useless without a system that converts insight into behaviou...
Not therapy, not consulting, not mentoring. What a real coaching engagement looks like from the inside, session by session.

Rather not read the article? You can listen to it instead.
There's a mystery around executive coaching that the industry partly cultivates and partly can't help. You hear that a CEO has a coach. You know it costs a significant amount. But what actually happens in those sessions? What are they talking about? And why do leaders who've tried it almost universally say it was one of the most valuable investments they've made?
Executive coaching is not therapy. It's not consulting. It's not mentoring. It occupies a space between those three that's hard to describe until you've experienced it. But here's what it actually looks like from the inside.
Most coaching engagements start with a stated objective. "I want to improve my executive presence." "I need to get better at strategic thinking." "My board says I need to work on communication."
Within two or three sessions, the real agenda surfaces. It's almost never exactly what was stated. The leader who wants better executive presence actually struggles with self-doubt that shows up under pressure. The one who needs strategic thinking is actually overwhelmed and can't create the space to think at all. The communication issue is actually a relationship issue with two specific stakeholders.
A coach's first job is helping the leader see past the presenting symptom to the underlying pattern. Not through analysis, but through questions. "When you say you want better presence, what does that look like in a specific moment? Walk me through the last time you felt you didn't have it." The specificity is where the insight lives.
This process feels uncomfortable. Leaders are accustomed to defining problems quickly and moving to solutions. Coaching slows that down deliberately because the most common leadership mistake isn't choosing the wrong solution. It's solving the wrong problem.
Once the real development area is clear, coaching becomes intensely practical. Each session typically follows a rhythm:
Check-in. What's happened since last time? What did you try? What worked? What didn't? This isn't a status update. It's reflection on live experiments. The leader has been practising new behaviours in real situations, and the session is where they process what they learned.
A current challenge. The leader brings a real situation they're navigating. Not a hypothetical. Something happening now: a difficult conversation coming up, a strategic decision they're wrestling with, a relationship that's stuck. The coach helps them think through it, not by giving advice, but by asking questions that surface assumptions, blind spots, and options the leader hasn't considered.
Commitment. What will you do differently before our next session? Not a grand plan. A specific behaviour to try in a specific situation. "In my next board meeting, I'm going to state my recommendation in the first two minutes instead of building up to it." Small, observable changes that compound over time.
The power of this rhythm is that development happens between sessions, not during them. The coaching conversation is the catalyst. The work, the real behaviour change, happens in the leader's actual environment.
A good coach does not tell you what to do. That's consulting. A good coach does not explore your childhood. That's therapy. A good coach does not share their war stories. That's mentoring.
What a coach does is hold a mirror. They reflect back what they hear, what they notice, and what seems inconsistent. "You said your team needs to take more ownership, but you've described three situations this month where you stepped in and took the decision back. What do you make of that?"
That question is simple. It's also the kind of question nobody in the leader's professional life asks them. Their team won't ask it. Their boss won't notice it. Their peers are dealing with their own patterns. The coach is the one person whose only agenda is the leader's growth.
The leaders who return to coaching after an initial engagement do so for one consistent reason: it's the only space in their professional life where they can think out loud without consequence.
In every other context, a senior leader's words carry weight. Musing becomes direction. Uncertainty becomes concern. Vulnerability becomes news. In a coaching session, a leader can say "I have no idea what to do about this" without it becoming a signal that the ship is rudderless.
That space, private, confidential, non-judgmental, is rare at senior levels. And the thinking that happens in it is qualitatively different from thinking done in isolation or in meetings. It's thinking with a partner whose only objective is to make your thinking better.
Coaching doesn't make leaders perfect. It makes them more deliberate. More aware of their patterns. More skilled at catching themselves before old habits take over. And for leaders operating in complex, high-stakes environments, that kind of awareness isn't a luxury. It's a competitive advantage.

Leadership Development Facilitator & Coach
Leadership development facilitator and coach with 20+ years as a senior executive. Co-founder of Leadetic, guiding businesses through transformation.
View Profile95% of leaders think they're self-aware. Only 10-15% are. But even real self-awareness is useless without a system that converts insight into behaviou...
The framework is elegant. The execution is messy. Why most candid feedback lands as either brutal or vague, and how to find the uncomfortable middle.
Every leader has a conversation they keep postponing. A step-by-step approach for the talk you know you need to have.